I am in the middle of completing a report on the use of Twitter by politicians who hold or are seeking Federal office.
As of today I've examined closely 42 Twitter accounts for authenticity. I do it because I care. The gist of my findings will be that a majority of staffers (who do not even Twitter for themselves and have no idea what the heck they are doing) are helping ruin their boss' reputation on Twitter by doing so ineffectively.
The sad part of all this will be that most politicians don't really give a darn. They won their election in the first place by hammering the other guy through indirect communication: phone messages, direct mail, paid TV spots and infomercials, earned media hits, etc. The easy stuff.
Communicating effectively in the modern world is not easy. And to be honest, just using Twitter will not make you an effective communicator. Look at Barack Obama's Twitter account as the primary example of an unauthentic, BORING Twitter profile. Notice how he's starting to lose followers?
You're honestly telling me that his staff don't want to arm Barack Obama with the ability to send a direct message to nearly 100k people anytime he wants? Are they crazy? An online townhall of followers that holds court on a daily basis with thousands of others through their tweets, blogs, vlogs, etc. Come on David Plouffe, get your head in the game strategy guy.
Let me conclude this rant: If you're a Twitterer. A real, honest-to-goodness Twitterer. Ask yourself this question: Would you ever, ever, ever let another person Twitter for you? Of course not because who knows what those people would Tweet when you weren't looking. And if that other person Tweeted something personal, like "I love broccoli" can you imagine how mad you'd be when it ruined you?!?!
Politicians, if you are too busy to send a text message to those of us who actually care what the heck you are saying, we are not going to give you permission to talk to us. I will TweetSlam you just like I dropped out of your Facebook group and FaceSlammed you. Bam. Done.
And instead, you'll have to send me a piece of mail (oh wait, I throw that out); you'll have to call me (oh wait, you don't have my cell phone); you'll have to buy a TV ad to influence my vote (oh wait, I don't watch TV unless it's on DVR so I can skip commercials).
These old guards are about to get a serious wake-up call.












Comments
David, very thought
David, very thought provoking. In essence politicians can choose to spend frivolous dollars on things we've all learned to disregard, or they can engage in less controllable but more authentic conversation.
I can see that working a little easier at local political level, is it even possible for a Presidential candidate to do much more than eat and sleep when campaigning? Perhaps the handlers and use of time is being spent wrong?
Twitter Brownbag
After all this bailout voting passes, I say John Culberson takes the floor and gives Congress a lesson about utilizing twitter and other new media to really reach their constituents and potential voters.
Love the idea Andrea! Be
Love the idea Andrea! Be sure to webcast it or get in on the C-spac schedule so all the state legislators can learn too. :)
Agree
Good thing is there are lots of us who will have a job advising the future candidates about how to properly reach their votes. Just as soon as we vote out all those who voted for the bailout. :D
Great points. Keep it up.
Sid
Wikinomics on Candidates and Social Media
Thought you might find this article interesting: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/02/obama-vs-mccain-online/
No, I didn't write it, so no spam, just interesting and worth some serious thought for McCain even in these last 30 days
got it
btw - you can use html
Post new comment